Link to inquiry form

Governance

Corporate Governance System

The Group seeks to improve its corporate value by emphasizing the establishment of good relationships with all stakeholders including shareholders, employees and business partners.

To achieve that, the Group believes it is essential to reinforce and enhance its corporate governance, and is making sincere efforts to establish an optimal management and administrative structure to ensure sound, efficient and transparent management.

Corporate Governance System Corporate Governance Report

Overview of the Current Corporate Governance System

Pursuant to the Companies Act, the Company has established the general meeting of shareholders, the Board of Directors, and the Audit and Supervisory Committee, and has elected directors, audit and supervisory committee members and an accounting auditor. The Company has also established, as voluntary organizations, the Nomination and Compensation Advisory Committee, Group Budget and Performance Review Meeting, Sustainability Committee, Group Risk Management Committee, Group Compliance Committee, Group Internal Audit Office, and Group Compliance Office.

In the nomination of directors, the Company employs highly independent outside directors.

The Company has adopted the current corporate governance system because it believes the system ensures sound, efficient and transparent management through the oversight functions of such outside directors and collaboration among the above-mentioned organs.

Board of Directors

The Board of Directors of the Company, which consists of six directors (including four outside directors), is authorized to determine the Company's business execution and supervise the directors' execution of duties.

The Company attaches great importance to the presence of outside directors to enhance the shared supervisory function among directors.

The members of the Board of Directors as of June 17, 2025 are two directors (excluding those who are audit and supervisory committee members), Shirou Terashita and Yutaka Fujiwara; and four directors who are audit and supervisory committee members, Akira Kimura, Kimikazu Noumi, Masahiko Ichie, and Kohei Kodama (all four of whom are outside directors). The chairperson is Shirou Terashita, Representative Director, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Skills matrix

  Management and corporate strategy Business strategy Marketing ESG management Finance Global Legal and risk management Audits and internal control
Shirou Terashita    
Yutaka Fujiwara        
Akira Kimura      
Kimikazu Noumi  
Masahiko Ichie          
Kohei Kodama        

Audit and Supervisory Committee

The Company is a company with an Audit and Supervisory Committee, which comprises four outside directors who are audit and supervisory committee members.

Using the internal control system, the Audit and Supervisory Committee conducts audits of the execution of duties of directors, as well as other general execution of duties relating to the Group's business management.

Its members are four directors (Akira Kimura, Kimikazu Noumi, Masahiko Ichie, and Kohei Kodama) who are audit and supervisory committee members, and its chairperson is Kimikazu Noumi.

Nomination and Compensation Advisory Committee

The Company has established the Nomination and Compensation Advisory Committee, which is composed of a majority of outside directors and chaired by an outside director, as an advisory body to the Board of Directors. By consulting the Nomination and Compensation Advisory Committee on the nomination of and compensation for directors, the Company ensures fairness and objectivity.

Its members are three directors (Akira Kimura, Kimikazu Noumi, and Masahiko Ichie), who are audit and supervisory committee members, and Shirou Terashita, Representative Director, President and Chief Executive Officer. The chairperson is Kimikazu Noumi.

Group Budget and Performance Review Meeting

To calculate the Group's earnings forecast and examine the disclosure thereof, the Company has established a Group Budget and Performance Review Meeting. Chaired by the general manager of the Corporate Planning Department, who is responsible for the overall management of the Group's budget, the Meeting is composed of the heads of the business divisions of each Group company and other appropriate members. By gathering and consolidating the necessary information, the Group Budget and Performance Review Meeting considers disclosure policies appropriate to the Company's business type, based on trends in the Group's performance, market conditions, and the specifics of each large-scale project for which orders either have been received or are expected.

The results of the review and other matters are specifically explained by the person who is responsible for the overall management to the Board of Directors through the Representative Director, President and Chief Executive Officer using verifiable materials such as the review process and the basis for the decision.

Sustainability Committee

The Company established a Sustainability Committee for the purpose of promoting the Group's sustainability initiatives.

The Committee, chaired by the director in charge of the Administration Department, is composed of the heads of the business divisions of each Group company and other appropriate members. It meets, in principle, after the end of each quarter and on an ad hoc basis upon the initiative of the chairperson to discuss, review, propose, and monitor basic policies and specific action measures concerning sustainability.

The results of the review and other matters are reported to the Board of Directors through the Representative Director, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Group Risk Management Committee

The Company established a Risk Management Committee for the purpose of identifying and evaluating risks that may be assumed in the course of the Group's business activities and examining countermeasures.

The Committee, chaired by the director in charge of the Administration Department, is composed of the heads of the business divisions of each Group company and other appropriate members. It meets, in principle, after the end of each quarter and on an ad hoc basis upon the initiative of the chairperson to confirm issues regarding Groupwide risks and monitor the progress of improvement measures. In addition, the Committee will also consider, make recommendations on, and monitor the establishment of an enterprise risk management (ERM) framework.

The results of the review and other matters are reported to the Board of Directors through the Representative Director, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Group Compliance Committee

The Company established a Group Compliance Committee in June 2023. By formulating policies, systems, and operation methods of compliance, the committee is tasked with ensuring that the entire Group is deeply aware of corporate social responsibility, observes relevant laws and regulations in daily business operations, and acts according to social ethics.

The Committee is chaired by the director in charge of the Administration Department and consists of the general manager of the Group Compliance Office, the general manager of the Internal Audit Office and the senior general manager of the Administration Department of each Group company, and other appropriate members. In order to accurately grasp the status of Group compliance, prevent violations, and respond to occurrences of violations, the Committee meets, in principle, after the end of each quarter and on an ad hoc basis upon the initiative of the chairperson.

The results of the review and other matters are reported to the Board of Directors through the Representative Director, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Group Internal Audit Office

The Company has established the Group Internal Audit Office. The Group internal audits are conducted by two Group internal auditors who are dedicated to auditing work.

As a general rule, the Group Internal Audit Office conducts audits of the Company and Group companies once every year with a view toward improving business efficiency, complying with regulations, the growing importance of compliance and a shared supervisory function based on the authorization of duties.

Audit results are promptly reported to the Representative Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, while the results and issues for improvement are referred to the Company and Group companies. To increase audit effectiveness, projected plans for remedial actions on those issues must be submitted to the Representative Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, who is responsible for audits.

In addition, the Group Internal Audit Office reports directly to the Representative Director as well as to the outside directors who are audit and supervisory committee members, on the audit results and projected plans for remedial actions on issues for improvement. This strengthens its monitoring function toward management while ensuring the effectiveness of internal audits.

Group Compliance Office

The Company is deeply aware of the Group’s social responsibility, observes relevant laws, regulations, and internal rules in our daily business operations, and follows a code of conduct that conforms to high standards for corporate ethics. To accurately gauge whether these efforts are proceeding correctly, we established a Group Compliance Office. The office is supervised by the director in charge of the Administration Department and consists of one dedicated member and two concurrent members. Its task is to accurately gauge the status of compliance in business operations throughout the entire Group to prevent violations from occurring. In particular, the office closely monitors efforts to prevent insider trading and efforts to comply with the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and the Act on the Protection of Personal Information.

The office concurrently serves as the secretariat of the Compliance Committee. By monitoring compliance and strengthening the system throughout the Group, it creates a structure that enables prompt decision-making.

Outside Directors

In nominating outside directors, the Company ensures independence of the candidates and determines that they do not have the possibility of conflicts of interest with general shareholders by complying with the standards prescribed by the Tokyo Stock Exchange, as well as the independence standards for outside directors prescribed by the Company.

The independence standards set by the Company are stated in “Independent Directors,” in the Corporate Governance Report.

Akira Kimura The Company has elected Mr. Akira Kimura as an outside director who is an audit and supervisory committee member because it has determined that with his wealth of experience and insight in global companies, he is well suited to assume the role of supervising the overall management of the Group from a broad, objective and sophisticated viewpoint based on his extensive knowledge gained from his professional experience, and thus to provide a broad range of advice and recommendations regarding important managerial judgment and decision-making of anticipated risks, etc. For these reasons, the Company expects Mr. Kimura to give advice and make comments to ensure the validity and legality of the decision-making of the Board of Directors, including the provision of necessary and appropriate advice and recommendations from an independent standpoint in order to further strengthen the corporate governance of the Group.
Kimikazu Noumi The Company has elected Mr. Kimikazu Noumi as an outside director who is an audit and supervisory committee member because it has determined that with his experience gained through his extensive activities, such as management of the financial business at financial institutions including The Norinchukin Bank, and fostering and supporting the businesses of companies through investment activities, as well as serving as an outside officer at various companies, he is well suited to provide a broad range of advice and recommendations regarding important managerial judgment and decision-making of anticipated risks, etc. For these reasons, the Company expects Mr. Noumi to give advice and make comments to ensure the validity and legality of the decision-making of the Board of Directors, including the provision of necessary and appropriate advice and recommendations, based on his extensive track record and experience in management, as well as in fostering and supporting the businesses of companies through investment activities.
Masahiko Ichie The Company has elected Mr. Masahiko Ichie as an outside director who is an audit and supervisory committee member because it has determined that with his experience of participating in various investment banking operations, such as venture capital, project financing, and financing for supporting business revitalization, and in managing business firms, he is well suited to provide a broad range of necessary and appropriate advice and recommendations regarding decision-making, etc. from an impartial and objective standpoint, independent from the management. For these reasons, the Company expects Mr. Ichie to give advice and make comments to ensure the validity and legality of the decision-making of the Board of Directors based on his extensive track record and experience as a corporate manager.
Kohei Kodama The Company has elected Mr. Kohei Kodama as an outside director who is an audit and supervisory committee member because it has determined that with his advanced expertise gained through his extensive experience in corporate legal matters and risk management within a global company, as well as serving as a member of the Financial System Council, which is closely tied to the Company’s operations, he is well suited to strictly monitor and oversee the Company’s management and provide a broad range of necessary and appropriate advice and recommendations regarding important managerial judgment and decision-making of anticipated risks, etc. For these reasons, the Company expects Mr. Kodama to give advice and make comments to ensure the validity and legality of the decision-making of the Board of Directors from his extensive corporate legal expertise and broad perspectives.

Evaluation of Effectiveness of the Board of Directors

From April 2024 through May 2025, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board of Directors by means of a written questionnaire and interviews based on the questionnaire with all relevant personnel. To ensure anonymity, the Company requested a third-party organization to carry out the assessment. Responses were received from all six directors of the Company and all 12 directors of IR Japan, Inc. and Japan Originated Investment Bank, Inc., wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, and IRJ Business Consulting Staff, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of IR Japan, Inc., as of the time of this evaluation. (Two directors concurrently serve as directors of the Company and Japan Originated Investment Bank, Inc.; two directors concurrently serve as directors of the Company and IR Japan, Inc.; and two directors concurrently serve as directors (or corporate auditors) of the Company and IRJ Business Consulting Staff, Inc.) The Company received an evaluation report based on the questionnaire and interview responses after the results of the questionnaire were compiled and the overall trends analyzed. Questions asked in the questionnaire and the evaluation results are as follows.

(Questions)
A total of 25 questions were asked (including open-ended questions) regarding the following major categories.

  1. Composition of the Board of Directors, etc.
  2. Effectiveness of the Board of Directors (Discussions at the Board of Directors)
  3. Effectiveness of the system of nomination of and compensation for directors and senior management
  4. Operation of the Board of Directors
  5. Open-ended questions

(Evaluation results)

The Company received the following evaluation from the third-party organization: “It is apparent that the Company has worked to improve issues that were previously pointed out, such as weakness in the administrative division structure. These efforts appear to be yielding positive results. Furthermore, as evidenced by comments such as the frank opinions being voiced by the outside directors and the chairperson’s acknowledgment of those opinions as proper, the operation of the Board of Directors is viewed as fully enabling the outside directors to exercise effective supervision.”

On the other hand, as future issues for deliberation and improvement, the report called for the following items: (1) a discussion on business strategies for enhancing corporate value over the medium to long term; (2) a discussion on strategic investments, etc.; (3) notification to the Board of Directors of the opinions and concerns received from shareholders, etc. Taking into consideration the above evaluation results, the Company will enhance its corporate value by continuing efforts to improve the corporate governance system.